For many years we have been trying to popularize the correct concept of a finite state machine. In fact, we do not invent anything, we just present a state machine as defined ca. 60 years ago. In the beginning it had been applied to a design of hardware systems as software did not exist at that time. But the concept of a finite state machine is not bound in any way to the hardware; it is just a notation to describe a behavior and as such it is not bound to the physical implementation.

## Archive for the ‘Finite state machine’ Category

### What is a state machine, again?

Monday, February 23rd, 2009### What is a state machine?

Monday, March 3rd, 2008Our web site contains several technical notes and papers that discuss some aspects of software engineering associated with the concept of a finite state machine. On introducing our blog we have decided to present you a few topics covered by a group of our documents. We started with the Mealy and Moore models of a finite state machine, honoring the fact that it is a favorite topic according to visitors’ statistics. The topic that we would like to present you today is “What is a state machine”.

### Moore or Mealy model

Friday, February 22nd, 2008Moore and Mealy models are the basic two models of state machines as defined in the literature. To understand the differences between them the actions (outputs) must be defined and bound to state changes. The technical note “Moore or Mealy model?” discusses both models and shows that the optimal solution is achieved when features of both models are used in a mixed model. Although the concepts of these two models are useful when performing certain theoretical studies, they are also interesting for software developers, and StateWORKS makes the use of a mixed model easy and effective.